The answer
No. It is a probability for a continuation under the model and decoding setup. That quantity is different from a calibrated assessment of factual correctness.
No. It is a probability for a continuation under the model and decoding setup. That quantity is different from a calibrated assessment of factual correctness.
A standard autoregressive language model produces next-token scores repeatedly. Some decoding methods explore alternatives, but the basic prediction is conditioned on the sequence available at each step.
Yes. The output vocabulary can contain punctuation, whitespace-related pieces, word fragments, and special markers in addition to complete words, so any permitted item may be selected.
Browse all our FAQs or reach out to our support team
Your learning library
Find your next course. Build something great.